Trending post
Bill Branstetter
Bullet point
Follow
Director of Recruiting, 9th Way Insignia
4
2 Answers
6 months ago
Like
Answer
Share
Jerilyn Brown
Bullet point
Follow
Top Answer
1 person found this answer helpful
Stellar Guest Services Advocate

I guess my concern would be that if companies looking to fill job roles utilize AI to find candidates there is that human ability to determine potential in a candidate that might be overlooked or filtered out in lieu of more obvious ones. Having a specific skill set or experience doesn't necessarily make a candidate best choice for fitting in with company culture or filling a role that requires innovation and "out of the box" vision. Having a human interviewing potential hires would still require them to review the resume of said candidates & it seems redundant to me. Sure, AI could filter totally non applicable applications but how many great potential employees would be lost to the process overall? Perhaps using video application processes could be effective if the interviewer is unaware they are interacting with AI. If the AI can evaluate body language, verbal inflection and determine the difference between a candidate being unsure of their answer to a question or simply taking a moment to reflect on the question before answering it is possible that process might be effective to select those to move forward in the process but I don't believe AI can replace human intuition or the ability to see potential in another individual.

25w
1
Reply
1 Marked Helpful
Naomie Caswell
Bullet point
Follow
Payroll Assistant at Concept Title Services Inc

AI is useful, but should never be the standard. Artificial Intelligence lacks the human element. However... Sad to say... It will continue to grow, performing even more jobs, replacing the human element.

25w
1
Reply
1 Marked Helpful
Add